Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Black House - Stephen King and Peter Straub

Black House (King and Straub, 2001)

After the mess of The Talisman, this book turned out to be pretty good.  A bit gruesome for my taste, but the plot was tight, the characters were memorable, and the Dark Tower-related scenes were excellent. The glimpse we get of the Crimson King's nether world is chilling and perfectly imagined.

Synopsis - a serial child killer is on the loose in a quiet Midwestern town. With two mutilated bodies found (I did mention gruesome, didn't I?) and two other children missing, the local police chief turns for help to 31-year-old "retired" Jack Sawyer, who has repressed all memory of his boyhood quest for the Talisman. Over the course of three or four intense days, that past must resurface if he is to face the evil powers helping the killer.

The characters here are much better. Henry Leyden, the blind man behind several of the area's most famous radio personalities, is a fascinating fellow whose skill and courage is put to a horrific test. The Thunder Five, a college-educated motorcycle gang determined to find the killer with or without the help of the police, also add a lot to the story. Jack is essentially the same faceless hero, but at least he doesn't have to carry the whole novel on his own this time.

There are two weak elements and one red card violation. First, the narrative style is very distracting. Meant as a shout-out to Dickens's Bleak House, which boasts a truly successful experiment in narrative technique, the limited omniscient fourth person present tense employed here might work if it didn't keep calling attention to itself, especially in the first two chapters: "And now we descend into the home of so-and-so. Doors are nothing to us, we pass through the walls like ghosts and see so-and-so sleeping. If we lean close, we can hear her talking in her sleep..." King and Straub, please get your metafictional jollies elsewhere.

Second, the supernatural elements are about as random as they were in The Talisman. Why does Jack see robin's eggs?  What's the deal with the bees and "d'yamba"?  Why is Speedy still the same age? Related to that, the character of the Territories changes to make it more Dark Tower-y. Suddenly Speedy is talking a little like Roland and mentioning Mid-World. Whatevs.

Last, the red card violation. The makey-outey scene after Jack flips back to the mental ward is completely unbelievable and inappropriate. The woman's son is missing, she's in a mental ward, she loves her husband, and she's met Jack twice. So what if he validates her dreams of the Territories? So what if Jack's in love with her Twinner (who he just met a few minutes ago)?  It makes no sense. No sense at all.

Arbitrary rating: 3.5 out of 5 college-educated motorcycle gangs

Monday, January 28, 2013

The Talisman - Stephen King and Peter Straub

The Talisman (King and Straub, 1984)

Sloppy. I don't know if it was a side effect of the collaborative writing process, or if the novelty of co-authorship pulled the wool over everyone's eyes, including the editors, but this is one of the sloppiest novels I've ever read. In some places, it is as if King and Straub had this grand vision of what they were going to write but only captured about a fourth of it on paper - things are hinted at but never explained, teased but never tasted.  In others, we see a narrative blatantly contradicting and undermining itself - yes, I checked - it said one specific thing and then the plot of the novel went off the rails based on the understanding that the opposite thing had been said. Finally, we have several things out of place - characters and ideas are mentioned as if we know them already (not as foreshadowing), then a few pages later (if we're lucky) they are introduced properly.

If there were merely narrative flaws here, all might be forgiven, but the story is just as sloppy, if not more so. The failings of the fantasy genre are on full display here. First, there seem to be no laws governing the magic of the Territories. Stuff just happens if the authors find it cool, and magic objects are discarded all too often in order for the protagonist to discover "the magic is in you". The quest has no clear object, no scope of importance, and no clear criteria for failure. I feel the need to discuss this in some detail, so if you're not worried about having the book spoiled, proceed beyond my arbitrary rating. (Though can one spoil something this rancid?) The characters are just props on the stage - their actions and motivations aren't believable or relatable.

There were some engaging vignettes in what is essentially a road novel, but none of the vignettes have enough narrative or emotional depth to tie everything together. The two strongest parts are Jack and Wolf's imprisonment in Sunlight Home (which is marred by fundamentalist Christian stereotyping and brutal violence) and Jack and Richard's travel through the Blasted Lands (which hints at more than it delivers and is marred by the unbelievability of Richard's character - for more on that, on you go past the arbitrary rating). On the whole, just like Jack's magic juice, this book left a bad taste in my mouth.

Arbitrary rating: 1 out of 5 meaningless quests

And now for the promised detailed discussion:

Jack's personal quest is to heal his mother by finding the Talisman. He accomplishes this goal. Then why do I say the quest has no clear object, no scope of importance, and no clear criteria for failure? Well, not very long into it, we realize that the Talisman is more important than Jack's mother. At that point, it becomes unclear to me why his mother (and the queen, her counterpart in the Territories) needs to survive. The only reason to save the queen is to prevent Morgan from taking power, so after Morgan is killed, there is no reason the queen needs to live. And all this time we've been hearing that the Talisman must be protected, that it is the axis of all possible worlds. Jack even sees little galaxies inside it. Several characters we've met throughout the story have their own little epiphany - a psychic "Hurrah!", if you will - when Jack gains the Talisman, thereby screaming out loud that the Talisman affects everyone's well-being. Yet the Talisman is destroyed in order to heal Jack's mom/the queen, so why is the life of one (two) human(s) worth the destruction of all those worlds? Or better yet, why would Morgan's destruction of the Talisman result in the destruction of those worlds, but Jack's doesn't? None of this is ever explained. Add it to the list of unexplained phenomena, like the funnel in the beach, the Oatley Tunnel, the possession of Thayer School, the saviorhood of Jack in the Territories (they never really say why they are worshipping him), the uncharacteristic flipping of the train, and the ruin of Point Venuti.  (Seriously, Richard couldn't have been vacationing there more than seven years ago - how could it have become an abandoned ruin peopled by crazies in that short amount of time, especially in the otherwise civilized state of California?)

The other thing that's really on my mind - at the beginning of the book, Speedy Parker says specifically - in Chapter 4 - that Jack should travel in the Territories whenever he can so that his journey is faster.  Yet repeatedly Jack "remembers" Speedy telling him to travel in modern-day American whenever possible, because it is safer.  Nowhere does Speedy tell him anything remotely like this. Speedy does tell him to stick the roads in the Rand McNally atlas since there are no maps in the Territories. The clear implication to this reader is that Jack should use Rand McNally in the Territories, because the roads are in similar locations (which indeed is the case throughout the book). Unfortunately, Jack spends most of his time in the boring old U.S.A., following Speedy's nonexistant injunction to the letter. Grr.

Okay, one more.  "Rational Richard"'s denial of the things happening around him is completely, utterly unbelievable. He insists he has a fever, he's hallucinating, the werewolves are actually Colombian drug lords... The last straw for me was when he purposefully destroyed his glasses so that he didn't have to see the things he couldn't understand.  That is just stupid. King wears glasses. How could he let something so completely unbelievable slip? I about quit reading the book right there.

I'm only scratching the surface here.  To read more on why you shouldn't read this book, check out this review (fair warning, there is a smidge of colorful language). I was so stymied by the flaws in the story, I didn't even get to the problems this reviewer found.